Showing posts with label past and contemporary women artists. Show all posts
Showing posts with label past and contemporary women artists. Show all posts

Wednesday, October 20, 2021

Everything But the Kitchen Sink: An Early Autumn Q & A


 I really liked the way you showed how just doubling a design or turning half of it upside down makes pretty new designs. (Our July 12th issue) I never thought about doing that.  Are you going to do more designs like that?'

I'm happy that you liked the designs. I'm going to give you a few more today.  I'm planning to do an issue about different ways to "turn the corners" on designs so that you can make borders around a pattern or "frame" a piece of fabric.  One way does not suit every design, so I will show several.  But that will be some time in the future.  It takes time to make all the samples, and this is a busy time of the year with the holidays all the way through New Year's.  You might use our Search function (in the sidebar) to find past posts on needlework designs in the meantime.

"Frames"
I did make an interesting discovery while I was making a simple sample to show you about framing a space.  It surprised me.   I could not remember being told about it in any of my many needle arts books. What I was doing was showing how to do a simple two-color "frame" around an open space. I started my sample by making upright stitches over an even number of the little "bars" that make the openings of the squares in the canvas.  I got a nice little rectangle, but it was rather small. Next to it I did the same routine with one more bar, which made a perfect square.  Does that mean I will get a rectangle when I stitch over an even number of bars and a square only when I stitch over an odd number of bars?  I tried another, larger sample.  Sure enough, it worked just like before.   I could not remember ever seeing that fact in any of my many needlework books.  I even checked several with no luck.  It seems I had discovered a nice little "rule of thumb"!  I'm thinking of calling it "Annake's Rule"!

Here are the other samples I promised you.  Have fun!




Why doesn't everybody count the Equinox as the first day of Fall?

In the countries and states which are farthest north or are largely mountainous, Fall is already over by September 22nd and Winter has begun.   Other places decide when Fall starts depending upon when the leaves change color or when a particular crop is harvested.  Still others start Fall on the first full moon after the Equinox, which wasn't until October this year. When I was a child. my father and I gathered in pumpkins, some kinds of squash, and some kinds of seed corn by that full moon and it was magical.

Why are the flowers that you put at the end of the story of the equinox so raggedy looking?

A composite flower
Because they are composites.  They are one of the latest kinds of flowers to appear on Earth, along with orchids — which have some neat tricks of their own.  A composite is really two different kinds of flowers on the same stem.  The outer ones that you call raggedy are there to attract pollinators like bees and butterflies. They usually have light or bright color, while the centers are often dark.  They may have a fragrance and small amounts of nectar.  They don't produce seeds themselves;  that is done by the center flowers. The pollinator usually walks across the center of the flower to get to the other side. As it does so it picks up pollen which it tracks across the center of the next flower of the same kind, allowing it to be pollinated.  Then the center flower can make seeds for the next generation.  In this way it can spread over larger and larger areas of land.  The flower parts are really easy to see on a sunflower. 


I hope you don't mind my asking you a crazy question, but I keep feeling that I remember something about frogs in the Bible, but I’m not sure what it was. Do you know?

That isn't a crazy question at all.  Actually, there are several mentions, with differing translations depending on which version you have.  There are also mentions of them in the works of many other religions, from Jewish and Islamic to Olmec and Toltec writings in ancient South America.  Frogs feature in the literature of Egypt, China, and Japan, as well.  Since this made a lasting impression on you, I suspect it comes from the Book of EXODUS.  Start at EXODUS, 4, and read and I think you will find your frogs. What is said about them differs, however, depending on the particular version you have.  Good luck in your quest.

We sure got a lot of fun out of those frogs!  But now my kids want to know all about toads.  They made me a list to give you. 
  • What is the biggest toad?
  • What is the smallest toad?
  • Where do they live?
  • How are toads different from frogs?
  • What do they eat?
  • How long do they live?
  • How do they defend themselves?
  • Were there toads when there were dinosaurs?
I sure hope you have the answers!

That is a really good list of questions.  You have some smart youngsters.  I will answer the questions one at a time and hope that my answers are up to date, because new information comes in all the time.

Cane Toad
1.  The largest toads are the Cane Toads of tropical South America.  They can be more than 9 inches long and weigh more than 2 pounds.   They have invaded both Florida, where they are being hunted and killed because they are destroying native animals at a great rate, and the Southwest through Texas.  Introduced into Australia, they have invaded African and Asian countries, killing off native species.   The largest one ever known was kept as a pet and weighed 5 pounds, 13 ounces and was 1 foot,  3 inches long.
   
Oak Toad
2.  The smallest known toad species is the Oak Toad.  It is found in backyards in the northeastern United States and Canada.  It is only 1.3 inches long. (That is about 33 mm, or 1 and 5/16 inches.) Scientists may eventually find even tinier ones.




3.  Toads live on all the continents except Antarctica.  With so much of it losing its icy covering because of a warming climate, we may find fossils there that tell they lived on that continent, too, millions of years ago.
 
4.   Toads have dry, often bumpy, skins, while frogs have moist ones.  Unlike frogs, toads do not have to live in or near water and some can be found in dry desert environments.  The only time most toads must be near water is when it is time to find a mate.  The males make a great deal of noise in hopes of attracting a female.  The female lays her eggs in the water.  The toads hatch as tadpoles, but they grow legs instead of tails and soon lose their gills. At that point they can leave the water until mating time comes the next year.  But some species do not produce tadpoles.  The eggs hatch and little "toadlets" emerge and go off to find something to eat.
 
Tadpoles
5.   The small ones eat insects, worms, snails, and small mammals like mice. Larger ones eat many of the same things, but also small snakes, larger small mammals, and eggs and baby birds of species that nest on or near the ground.

Golden Toad
6.  The greenish-blue and greenish-gray ones stay where there are plants growing close to the ground.   They stay close to or underneath them.   Others are brightly colored to advertise how poisonous they are.  And, as I said, they puff themselves up to look much larger than they actually are.
 


Yellow-bellied Toad


7.   Most species live 5 to 10 years, but there was one kept in captivity, fed and protected, that is said to have lived nearly 40 years.





8.   Yes,  they were around at the same times as dinosaurs.   A recent fossil was found from about 70 million years ago that was so large they have given it a scientific name that means "Devil Toad".

It was several times the size of today's species and would have weighed 10 pounds or more.  An artist's rendition of it shows a huge mouth.  Above the eyes were two horn-like bony structures.  It had sharp teeth. It was certainly large enough to have eaten dinosaur eggs and newly hatched baby dinosaurs.  It's skin was probably rough and bumpy across the back, with a pattern of brown lines.  Its skin was lighter and smoother on the underside.  What impressed me most was that its eyes were at the front of its head instead of on the sides, so that it was looking right at its prey, much like the newly found living giant frog we gave you the link to in the former article. For a look at one artist’s re-creation of the “Devil toad”, go to


Finally, a last minute question about the post that immediately precedes this one, which I’ll turn over to J.D., since he is responsible for all our illustration (as well as the research that led to the last section of that article):

You said Julie Manet Rouart was an artist, like her mother. Why didn’t you show any of her work?

Since we don’t monetize this blog (that is, we do not make any money from it’s publication), we have to depend on our own work or public domain sources for illustrations.

Sample Public domain notice (from Wikimedia)

As you may recall from the post in question, Julie lived until the year 1966 — which means her works are still copyrighted in most countries, and so NOT in the public domain.
—J.D.

I hope this has answered some of your questions. Enjoy!






 Creative Commons LicenseThis post by Annake's Garden is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License.

Thursday, September 23, 2021

Intersecting Lives: Two Female Impressionist Painters

Impressionist portraits of Mary Cassatt (l) & Berthe Morisot (r)
Some time ago I promised to do a comparison of two female painters who were contemporaries, and sometimes competitors, in Paris in the late 1800's. The American artist was Mary Cassatt and the native French artist was Berthe Morisot, who is less well-known in the United States.

Maternity, Mary Cassatt
In gathering information about the two of them, I encountered some discussion on the painting of children — one of Mary's specialties — from early times to the present. I considered touching on that subject briefly before turning to my two "principals", which led me to thinking about my own artwork regarding children and how I achieved relaxed, un-posed sketches. So, before this project got completely out of hand, I decided to save those topics for a later post.



Mary Cassatt, self-portrait
Mary Cassatt was born near Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania in 1844. She was the daughter of a wealthy banker, with whom she had a contentious relationship throughout their lives.  After attending the prestigious Pennsylvania Academy of Fine Arts, she toured Europe, visiting France, Italy, Spain and Holland.  Always interested in art, she studied the work of the Old Masters, even paying for private lessons at the Louvre. When the prestigious Salon finally allowed women to submit work for showing, Cassatt was one of the first two American women whose work was accepted in 1868. (In deference to her father’s violent opposition to Mary becoming a professional artist, she entered her work under the name “Mary Stevenson”.) She returned home to Pennsylvania in 1870 to escape the outbreak of the Franco-Prussian War in Europe.

Degas, sculpture of a dancer
Chafing under her father’s refusal to support her artistic endeavors in any form, and her inability to sell her work in the U.S. due to the social mores of the time, in 1872 she returned to Paris for further study. She especially admired the work of Edgar Degas, known for his paintings of the ballet. He saw one of her works at the Paris Salon of 1874.  Both preferred detailed sketches to painting and Degas recognized her considerable ability.  They finally met in 1877, and began a friendship that was to last for many years. Although he was never her teacher, he made many useful suggestions and encouraged her to drop the conventional studies she felt dull and confining.



Cassatt, Mother Combing Her Child's Hair
At Degas's urging, she began to exhibit her work with the Impressionists.  Thereafter she devoted herself to subjects which reflected her interests, especially domestic scenes, children. and gardens.  Although Mary seems to have forsaken any interest in marrying and having a family of her own, she is probably best known for her paintings of mothers and their children.  She also painted ordinary people doing ordinary things.  Mary once claimed that she could paint an attractive picture of an unattractive subject.  And, as Sister Wendy Beckett, who chose two of Cassatt's paintings for her book of 1,000 masterpieces remarked, "After all, that's almost a definition of art." Both Cassatt and Degas broke away from the Impressionists in 1882, but she returned later and he continued to stay in touch with artists both in and out of the Impressionists.

Mary Cassatt, The Letter
Among her other influences were Japanese woodcuts, which were popular at the time. She tried very hard to interest other Americans who studied in or visited France in the work of the Impressionists, buying many of their works for herself, her family, and her friends.  She remained close friends with Degas. The two artists had similar social backgrounds and intellectual tastes.  She posed for several of his paintings. From 1912 onward she gradually lost her sight — as did Degas — and had to give up painting, though she continued to promote the work of younger American female artists and other suffragist causes.  On July 11, 1926, she died at a chateau near Beauvais, France.



Berthe Morisot, self-portrait
Berthe Morisot was born in 1841 in Bourges, France.  Her father, who had studied architecture, was an important government official.  Her mother had family connections to the important Rococo painter Jean-Honoré Fragonard. The family moved to Paris while Berthe was just a child. It was decided that all three sisters should have some training in art, while their brother followed their father's profession. The girls were taken to the Louvre, where they were introduced to the work of great artists from around the world.  One of the sisters left the group early, but the other two continued copying the works of the masters. They had to have a chaperone, were forbidden to speak to anyone,  and were refused entrance to certain exhibits. As she later did as a professional artist, Berthe made many quick sketches of everything that attracted her attention. This habit was useful to her later in her painting career because she could, for example, work on realistic spring or summer scenes even in the dead of winter.  Berthe had determined at an early age that she would make a career of being an artist, not just a hobby. After she finished working at the Louvre, she studied briefly with traditional teachers, but found the work unsatisfactory and moved on.

The Louvre

The Paris Salon held an annual juried art show. It was a government-sponsored body that housed the show, which was judged by the members of the Academy des Beau Arts.  Women were not at that time permitted to show their work. However, there was a special provision set up to thank the artists and others who worked at the Louvre.  Berthe was allowed to participate in that and received a certificate and other honors. She was promised a spot in that category for at least the next six years.   Women were eventually allowed to compete at the larger salon event.

Landscape sketch by Corot
From 1862 to 1868, she studied with Jean-Batiste Camille Corot, cementing a friendship which lasted for many years.  The first thing Corot, who was both a landscape painter and a figure painter, did was to make sure she became a plein-aire painter. That is, she learned to do her sketching and painting outdoors in the "plain air". This gave her painting a freer and more colorful approach and she often recommended it to other artists. (For more about the influence of Corot — whose paintings "hooked" me on art when I was a child — and his contemporaries, see our posts of February 19, 2018 and May 14, 2020.)

Morisot, Mother and Son in a Boat
When the Paris Salon finally opened to women,  Berthe entered the competition for most of the next decade, but refused to enter in one year's Salon because one of her paintings had been partially painted over by the judges without her knowledge or agreement.  Degas and other friends urged her to join with the Impressionists in a show that they had put together.  She did so, was very well received, and made many more friends. She did return to the Salon, but continued in her participation with the Impressionists. She single-handedly put together their first large exposition, as she would do again for their last one in 1886. Soon she was spoken of as the first female Impressionist. (There were others. You know about Cassatt. If you are interested in others, here are a few names: Marie Braquemond,  Eva Gonzales, Cecelia Beaux, Lilla Cabot Perry.)

Manet's La Repos, feat. Berthe
Berthe met Edouard Manet in 1868 and they quickly struck up a working relationship,  criticizing each other's work and giving advice which improved both of their paintings. Manet painted her portrait several times; she introduced him to outdoor painting, which improved his over-all painting. In 1872 a prominent dealer bought a number of her paintings and quickly sold most of them.  From that time on she sold her work regularly and made more money than many of her male Impressionist friends as well as her Salon competitors. She won over many of the critics who had judged her harshly. In addition to her own painting, she modeled for many other artists. She was a beautiful woman, tall and graceful with glossy dark hair and luminous eyes. But if you look carefully at the paintings, you will see that she often was not smiling and that there was a sadness or frustration in her demeanor. She once wrote that no man had ever treated her as an equal and that distinction was all she wanted from them.  She was her own most severe critic,  seldom satisfied with her work.

Eugene Manet and His Daughter, by Morisot
In 1874 she married Manet's younger brother Eugene, a writer and painter. He gave up those pursuits to manage her affairs and give her more time to paint. In 1877 they welcomed their only child, Julie. After becoming a mother, Berthe painted numerous pictures of children, her own and her nieces and nephews.  The paintings seemed to give her great pleasure and she was not as critical about them as she was about her other work.  Most of her paintings and prints were small. She experimented with watercolors, charcoal, colored pencils, pastels, even a bit of engraving. She had studied sculpture, but none of hers survived.  She was most successful when she did her central motifs in chalk or pencil, overlaid with watercolors, surrounded by bright backgrounds done in oils.

Sketch of Julie by Morisot
Edouard Manet died suddenly in 1883.  Eugene's health began to fail.  Berthe had her first solo exhibition in 1892, but her world was to come to a shocking halt in that same year when Eugene died suddenly.  It was difficult for Berthe to continue working at her usual pace after she became a widow and single mother. In 1895 Julie became very ill with influenza during an epidemic.  Berthe managed to nurse her back to health, but contracted the disease herself and quickly became ill with pneumonia, dying a few days later and leaving her daughter an orphan at 16.

So, there we have the stories of the lives of two influential female artists whose life journeys were very similar in some ways and very different in others, but intersected in the brief height of the Impressionist movement in France. They must have been acquainted; they certainly each were aware of the other’s work. Were they friends? Were they rivals? The answer is somewhat complicated.

Berthe Morisot, Le Berceau
Some writers have reported that Berthe was put off in her first introduction to Mary, whether because of her brusque American manner, her uncompromising suffragist attitudes, or her uncultured and clumsy French. (Or, most probably, some combination of those.) And they were each drawn to different factions among the male Impressionists — who were never as united as art historians would have you believe. But things changed as both women matured and moved on from the fading Impressionist movement. While never ‘BFF’s’, they developed an easy, cordial relationship, even studying together briefly in the last year before Berthe’s untimely death.

Mary Cassat, Summertime
After both had passed away, their reputations looked to diverge even more strangely than their lives: Mary, the ex-patriot American who staunchly refused to be labeled as anything except an independent woman and professional artist became the icon of women in the French Impressionist school. Berthe, first of the female Impressionists, and critically and commercially more successful than the majority of her male colleagues, seemed fated to become just a footnote in the history of Impressionism anywhere outside her native France.

Except for ….

Sketch of Julie by Renoir
Julie Manet, Berthe’s only child, orphaned at 16 did not lack for resources. Between her family connections and the good will Berthe inspired among her colleagues, it seemed as though the entire arts community of belle epoque France was determined to ride to her rescue. The famous poet Mallarmé became her guardian, and she went to live, comfortably, among her many cousins. She never lacked financial or emotional support.



Renoir, portrait of Julie Manet
Julie herself seemed determined to follow in her mother’s footsteps. Like Berthe, she modeled for artists of a number of schools — most notably Pierre-Auguste Renoir. Like Berthe, she became an artist in her own right. And like her mother, she married into yet another well-known family of artists, becoming the bride of Ernest Rouart, second son of the Impressionist Henri Rouart. Furthermore, like Berthe, she tended to accumulate art: works she inherited, gifts from admirers, her own and her husband’s unsold pieces, and purchases from friends and needy colleagues.



Portrait of Julie Manet, Painting - Ernest Rouart

Unlike her mother, however, Julie Manet Rouart managed to raise three children. And, most unlike Berthe, she survived not only the “Beautiful Era” of 19th century France but also two World Wars and nearly two-thirds of the 20th century! She eventually passed away at a fine old age of 88, in Paris in 1966.  Her son, Julien, endowed the Marmottan Monet Museum in Paris with much of her remaining art collection.

But it was as a writer, like both her father and her guardian, that Julie achieved her greatest fame. In 1987, twenty years after her death, her estate released the diaries she kept from age 10 until her marriage to Ernest for editing and publication as Growing Up with the Impressionists, which included not only her childhood remembrances of her parents and their friends, but also candid accounts of dinner-table conversations between various artists both before and after her parents’ deaths. It has remained in print in various editions and translations up to the present day — and is at least partly responsible for a re-examination of Berthe’s work and her eventual recognition as one of the finest female Impressionist artists.






 Creative Commons LicenseThis post by Annake's Garden is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License.

Sunday, May 2, 2021

WHERE WERE THE WOMEN?: Women Artists of the 16th Century


One question I am regularly asked is if I am going to do more short articles about women artists who influenced the arts in the past.  I had the script outlined to do a longer-than-usual segment comparing and contrasting the art of American painter Mary Cassatt and her French counterpart, Berthe Morisot. (You will get to read that later this year.)   The topic is, I think, a very important one, and one I plan to follow up in future articles.  I also want to make young people — men and women — aware that it took a long time to acquire the rights and stature that many of you enjoy today — and which your parents or other ancestors may not have enjoyed. So, from time to time I will inject some opinions and tell you some experiences I have had in my very long life. Please bear with me.

Two things happened recently that convinced J. D. and me that something larger and broader needed to be written right away. First of all, we started watching a series about art detectives. These people retrieve stolen artwork, prove that some paintings are fakes, uncover "lost" works by other artists, and sometimes are able to return artwork that was stolen from people during World War II by the Nazis to surviving members of their families. We were greatly impressed by the way these detectives worked so diligently with the smallest clues and scoured all sorts of information sources.

Shortly thereafter, J.D. sent me a link to an NPR story about an interesting group in Florence, Italy, who have set out to locate, reclaim, and — wherever possible — restore the work of women artists from the region of Florence who were well-known  during and after the 16th Century. They used the title "Where Are the Women?" The group calls itself the Advancing Women Artists (AWA). In the years since the establishment of AWA, its director, Linda Falcone, has spent much of her time going into the storage spaces of museums and art galleries, searching for the work of forgotten women artists. The group has discovered nearly 2,000 pieces of women's artwork.


Florence, Italy

Bankrolled by a wealthy American woman philanthropist, Jane Fortune, they forged ahead with many projects. Unfortunately, their benefactor died in 2019 and the AWA will close operations in the summer of 2021 for lack of funds. They feel they have accomplished most of their mission by raising awareness and are seeing similar projects start up in other parts of the world.

Why weren't there more women artists during and after the Renaissance? Mainly because women were not citizens during those centuries. They could not own property or run businesses in most places. They did not even have the rights to their own children, who could be taken away from them by their husbands or the husband's family, and they might never see them again. Aren't you glad that is ancient history? But, wait a minute, just how ancient is that history? The women of the United States acquired the right to vote on August 18, 1920. (The 100th Anniversary of Women's Suffrage was very quietly celebrated on August 18, 2020, but you probably missed it.) It may be necessary to protect that right again in the future, so don't take it for granted and be ready to defend it if necessary.

In the 16th Century it was a risky proposition for women of that time to want to have careers or run their own businesses, unless they had some kind of backing or protection from men or from the Church. One of the most successful women of the 16th century was Plautilla Nelli. She was the daughter of a member of the merchant class and was intelligent and well-educated. She had met a number of male artists before she became a nun. She entered a Dominican convent at the age of 14. She taught herself how to draw and paint by studying religious works and reproductions of artworks in books. She went on to establish a workshop of nuns who took on church commissions and private clients as well as producing large-scale Biblical scenes for their own convent. She signed her work, adding a request that the recipient of her work pray for the female painter that she was. Her work was much in demand because people felt she endowed it with special piety. When the AWA began researching her work, only 3 existing examples were known. Now there are about 20, with still more to be tracked down.

Nelli's "Last Supper", as restored

The most important "find" was a rendition of the Last Supper — the only one ever known to have been done by a woman. Or women, for there are parts of the painting that indicate they were done by other hands than Nelli's, although the basic painting was obviously hers. The painting, is huge, measuring 7 meters in length and 3 meters in height (23 feet X 10 feet). Most "Last Suppers" are static, but this one is full of movement and emotion. Nelli looks at the situation with a woman's perspective. The table is set with dishes, glasses, food and drink. Creases in the tablecloth show it has been ironed.

Nelli chose to focus on the moments after Jesus announced to his followers that he had been betrayed — sold out for a small bag of silver coins — and that he would be arrested and crucified. The men are life-sized. Each face shows a different emotion. There is Thomas, the doubter, trying to decide if what he heard is real. There is Peter, beginning to show the fear for his own life that would cause him to deny any knowledge of Jesus three times before the cocks crowed at dawn. Although Nelli, even as she became abbess of the convent, had limited contact with men, the expressions on the faces and the body language of the disciples are compelling and true to life.

Bologna, Italy
Many successful male artists had workshops that were actually small factories. Their children were put to work at various jobs so they would learn how to keep the business going into the next generation. Often one or more of the children showed unusual talent and were allowed to take lessons. A case in point is that of Lavinia Fontana. Her father, Prospero, was a successful Mannerist* painter who had a small "stable" of painters, including his talented daughter. Born in Bologna, but later moving to Rome, she was one of the first women to be commissioned to do large figure paintings. Lavinia is credited with about 150 paintings, which she managed to complete in between giving birth to eleven children!

Painting by Giuseppe Arcimbolo
*Mannerist painting and sculpture was a style of art popular in the 16th Century as a kind of rebellion against the classical religious painting of the time. It tended to be less realistic than most Renaissance work. It was more emotional, using elongated human figures, "special effects" of scale, lighting, and perspective, and often garish colors. During the later half of the century, Mannerism became more intellectual, more intricate, and more forward-looking, making it much more popular with sophisticated people. Some four centuries later, it became the cornerstone of "modern art".

Nelli and Fontana were not alone in their endeavors. (I managed to make a list of 40 women artists of the 16th Century in just about 40 minutes of searching.) Nor were they all painters. There were ceramists, woodworkers, jewelry makers, engravers, calligraphers, and many other professionals, including female musicians.

Now, back to the 20th Century. American women had the vote, so they had all the rights and privileges, correct? Wrong! For one thing, my mother and other women found it very difficult to get credit, let alone credit cards or charge accounts without the backing of a father or husband. And that is just one of many "stumbling blocks" put in their way.

Now let's talk about another practice that you have probably not come across. that of “indentured servitude". These young women and girls (commonly called "bound girls") were, when they were teenagers, sold by their families to wealthier families to be servants. They remained 'bound’ for years as they worked to pay back the money their family had been paid, out of the pittance they earned. And of course the family to whom they were bound charged them for everything they could think of to increase the time before they could be free. Some literally died in bondage. And none of them were women of color. They were white. Some earned their freedom and married. They usually had few children because they were nearly past their child-bearing years when they achieved freedom. How do I know? Because I knew two of them. One was our next door neighbor when I was in junior high school. The other lived about four blocks away. Both had teenage sons.  I went to school with both boys and dated one of them when we were in high school.

Be grateful for all of your opportunities, use them wisely, and never,  ever, take them for granted.

With love,



 Creative Commons LicenseThis post by Annake's Garden is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License.

Contact Us

Name

Email *

Message *

Blog Archive